
Run a Thought Leader Ad off a creator's post and something specific happens in LinkedIn's Campaign Manager: the objective is locked to brand awareness. Not lead gen, not website conversions, not video views as a bidding goal. LinkedIn built the format for reach and trust transfer, and it stops there. Whatever happens after someone sees the ad is entirely on you to build.
Most brands don't build it. They run the awareness flight, watch the CTR come in higher than a company-page ad would have delivered, call the campaign a win, and move on. The creator did the hard part lending their credibility to a message a buying committee actually paid attention to and then that attention gets left on the table because nobody set up what comes next.
Start with what "engagement" actually means on a Thought Leader Ad, because it's where most retargeting setups go wrong before they've begun. LinkedIn counts a click on "see more" someone expanding a long post to keep reading the same way it counts someone clicking through to a landing page. Both land in the same engagement bucket by default.
Build a retargeting audience straight off that bucket and you've built an audience that includes people who spent two seconds deciding the post wasn't for them. Paid retargeting against that pool costs the same per impression as retargeting against people who genuinely engaged. It just performs worse, and it's easy to blame the creative or the offer when the actual problem is upstream: the audience was never filtered.
Because the Thought Leader Ad objective can't be pointed at conversions, treating it as a self-contained campaign misreads what the format is for. It's the top of a structure, not the whole structure. The conversion-focused campaign lead gen, website visits, whatever the actual commercial goal is has to be built separately and pointed at whoever the first campaign surfaced.
This is the step that gets skipped most often, not because it's hard, but because the awareness campaign already produced a CTR worth screenshotting for a client report. It's easy to stop at the metric that looks good and never build the campaign that was supposed to follow it.
The fix is a layered campaign structure, not a single retargeting list pulled from whatever LinkedIn hands you by default.
Campaign 1 broad reach. The Thought Leader Ad itself, running the creator's post to the target account list. This is the trust-transfer layer. Its only job is reach against the right accounts.
Campaign 2 engagers. Everyone who interacted with Campaign 1 moves here, but the creative changes. This layer pushes video, because video-view data is a cleaner signal than click data.
Campaign 3 the qualified pool. Only the video viewers who watched roughly 75% or more of the clip get pulled into a 90-day retargeting window. That threshold is what separates someone who was genuinely absorbing the message from someone whose thumb paused for a second on the way past.
Three campaigns, each one narrowing the audience by intent instead of by raw volume. What comes out the other end is smaller than the original reach number and worth considerably more.
Even inside that qualified pool, not all signals carry equal weight, and lumping them together flattens exactly the information you built the structure to capture.
Ninety-day site traffic is the strongest signal available someone left LinkedIn entirely and went to look at the product. Sixty-day video views sit in the middle. Thirty-day Thought Leader Ad clicks are the weakest of the three, even after the "see more" noise has been filtered out, because a click inside LinkedIn's feed is still a much smaller commitment than leaving the platform.
Message and offer should differ across these three groups. Treating a 30-day TLA clicker the same as a 90-day site visitor wastes the layering work done to get here.
An employee-run Thought Leader Ad has a slower decay curve. The person is still at the company next quarter, still postable, still available to run a follow-up. A campaign built around an external creator doesn't have that luxury the usage window on that content is contractually finite, and the trust it generated with a buying committee member has a shelf life that isn't tied to your campaign calendar at all.
If a creator's post is what got a VP of Marketing to actually read something from a vendor they'd otherwise ignore, the few weeks after that moment are the highest-value window available. No retargeting structure means that moment produces a CTR and nothing else. The buying committee member goes back to whatever they were doing, and the next brand that reaches them with a sharper follow-up gets credit for work your creator's content already did.
The Thought Leader Ad is the easy part to get right many teams do. The retargeting layer behind it is the part almost nobody builds, which is exactly why building it properly is worth more than another round of creative testing on the ad everyone already agrees is working.

Six years inside LinkedIn. $75M in ad spend managed. $700M in pipeline generated for HP, Expedia, Thomson Reuters and the London Stock Exchange. At Kleos, that operating knowledge is what every client gets specifically, how buying committees form preferences before the sales conversation starts. The same material I teach on the MBA programme at IE Business School.
See how Kleos can help your brand become the most trusted voice in your market.
Work with Kleos